Real-World Single-Centre Experience of Jak Inhibitor Use in Ra

Background/Aims The use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) has been gradually increasing overtime in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory arthritis and these appeal to patients. being oral agents. Nevertheless, rheumatologists have become cautious about their use since recent trials have shown safety concerns about VTEs, MACE and malignancies. Methods We decided to study use of JAKi at our centre in Princess of Wales Hospital Bridgend. The aim was to assess whether appropriate patients were selected (considering cautions about MACE, VTEs and malignancies). We also wanted to see whether all patients had required pretreatment safety testing and post-treatment monitoring performed. Results These were 70 patients;59 were females and 11 were males. All of them were diagnosed as RA. Average age was 61.1 years (20-85), average duration of disease 129.9 months (16-340) and average duration of treatment was 58.1 weeks. The most common JAKi being used was baricitinib (84%) followed by tofacitinib (12%) and upadacitinib (4%). 50% patient were on concomitant csDMARDs among whom two-thirds were on methotrexate. Looking at previous biologic use, 9 patients were biologic naive, 22 had one biologic, 15 had two biologics used in the past. All patients were appropriately selected (severe RA and no significant risk factors for MACE, VTEs and malignancies). All patients had pre-treatment Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, latent TB, FBC and LFTs checked. All patients had FBC and LFTs monitored post treatment. No patient developed VTE, MACE or cancer on treatment. 84.2% patients had lipids tested before starting JAKi. 22.8% patients had abnormal lipids before Rx initiation and 62.5% of these were on lipid lowering Rx. All patients had lipids tested post treatment, but the timing was quite variable and only 62.5% of patients had lipids tested on the recommended time. There were 2 deaths recorded in this cohort. One of those was an 80-year-old RA patient on baricitinib 2mg OD, who died due to chest infection on the background of ILD. He was not on steroids or csDMARDs. The second patient was 63 years' old (on baricitinib 4mg OD), and died due to respiratory sepsis, and was also on azathioprine. She had RA with advanced ILD. The reasons for discontinuing JAKi were inefficacy (46%), side effects (39%) and both inefficacy and side effects (15%). 41.4%of patient experienced side effects due to JAKi. These included infection 28%, deranged lipids 17%, cytopenia 14%, deranged LFTs 14%, GI side effects 10%, skin rash 7% and varicella zoster 3%. Conclusion There has been steady increase in the use of tsDMARDs for RA and other rheumatic conditions. Due to short half-life, these drugs became a popular choice during COVID-19 pandemic but on the other hand safety monitoring became extremely challenging during this time.

Long-Term Outcomes of Treatment With and De-Escalation From a Combination of Vedolizumab and Another Biologic or Tofacitinib for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: There are scant data on long-term outcomes of treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with a combination of advanced therapies, including after de-escalation. Method(s): We identified patients with IBD at a tertiary center who began therapy with vedolizumab (VDZ) in combination with another advanced therapy (biologic or JAK inhibitor) between 2016 and 2020 and examined their outcomes through 6/1/22. We defined biochemical remission as CRP, 5 mg/L and calprotectin < 150 mcg/g, and endoscopic remission as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (CD) 0. Short-term outcomes of this cohort were previously reported. Result(s): Fourteen patients with a median of 322 (IQR 251-322) weeks of follow up were identified. 10 had ulcerative colitis, 3 CD, and 1 indeterminate colitis. VDZ was combined with tofacitinib in 9 patients, ustekinumab in 3 and adalimumab in 2. Median time on combination therapy was 94 weeks (IQR 17-133). Eight patients achieved objective remission (3 biochemical, 5 endoscopic), 1 changed combination with subsequent endoscopic remission, 2 had primary non-response, 1 had secondary non-response, 1 stopped within 1 month due to reported adverse effect (paresthesia), and 1 lacked follow-up data. Eight patients de-escalated to a single agent, 4 at physician direction and 4 due to insurance denial. Before de-escalation, 6 had objective remission (2 biochemical, 4 endoscopic). After de-escalation, 3 patients maintained objective remission (2 biochemical, 1 endoscopic), 3 had disease flare, of which 1 required colectomy, and 2 lacked data. All 3 patients with disease flare had de-escalated following an insurance denial. Two patients remained on combination therapy through follow up: 1 has endoscopic remission after changing one drug of their combination and 1 has ongoing moderate endoscopic disease despite combination therapy. There were 2 infections requiring hospitalization (rotavirus, C. difficile), and 8 non-serious infections (5 mild SARS-COV-2, 1 peristomal cellulitis, 1 pneumonia, 1 sinus) while on combination therapy. Conclusion(s): In long-term follow up of this small cohort, there were no new signals on effectiveness or safety of combining advanced agents. De-escalation to a single agent was tolerated in half of patients with follow-up data;all patients who flared following de-escalation had adjusted therapy due to insurance denial. More data is needed to inform de-escalation decisions.

PANLAR 2023 Abstracts

The proceedings contain 238 papers. The topics discussed include: treatment with tofacitinib attenuates muscle loss through Myogenin activation in collagen-induced arthritis;plasma cytokine levels in a group of Colombian patients with moderate systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis;prevalence of neoplastic disease in patients with systemic sclerosis in a south American cohort;characterization of rheumatic manifestations in patients with HIV infection from a south American hospital;anthropometric measures of central adiposity in the evaluation of metabolic syndrome in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies;anti RO 52/60 antibodies and their clinical serological correlation. single center descriptive study;safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and CHADOX1 vaccines against SARS-COV-2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Brazilian multicentric study;and effect of ABO and RH blood type on SARS-COV-2 infection severity in patients with rheumatic diseases: data from the national SAR-COVID registry.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Real-World Experience from a Regional Centre in Uk

Background/Aims Tofacitinib and baricitinib were the first orally available, targeted synthetic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the UK. Evidence suggests that JAK inhibitors are as efficacious as biological DMARDs in the treatment of RA. Their safety profile has been demonstrated in long term extension studies and RCTs. However, real-world, long-term data remains as important in bridging the gap between controlled studies and routine practice. We report our initial real-world experience of a cohort of RA patients commenced on JAKi before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic within a regional centre in the UK. Methods All patients commenced on JAKi for the treatment of RA between February 2018 and March 2020 were identified from our in-house database. Data was retrospectively collected from clinical notes and electronic health records from February 2018 up until April 2022. This included patient demographics, disease duration, serological status, concurrent csDMARD usage, history of bDMARD exposure, duration of use and reason for discontinuation of the drug if appropriate. DAS- 28 scores were recorded at baseline and quarterly. SPSS (version 22.0) was used for data analysis. Results One hundred thirty patients were treated with JAK inhibitors (Tofacitinib 22%, Baricitinib 78%);80% female, mean (S.D.) age 61.5 (12.3) years. 92 (70.8%) patients were seropositive. 70 (53.8%) patients were on concurrent csDMARDs and 23 (17.7%) on concurrent steroids. The mean number of previous bDMARDs was 1.8 +/- 1.7;41 (31.5%) were bDMARD naive. The mean baseline DAS-28 ESR (S.D.) score was 5.96 (0.96). There were significant differences in mean DAS- 28 ESR scores (compared with baseline) of 1.54, 1.96, 2.41, 2.33 and 1.80 at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months respectively (p<0.0001). Mean DAS-28 ESR scores were not statistically significant between bDMARD naive patients and those that had previously received bDMARDs. Overall JAKi retention rate was 66.9% with a mean follow up duration of 27.4+/-13.1 months. Persistence was 88.5%, 76.9%, 73.2% and 68.5% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Of the 38 patients who stopped JAK inhibitors, 11 stopped due to inefficacy (6, primary inefficacy). 3 patients were lost to follow-up and 6 deceased. Cause of death was sepsis (2), venous thromboembolism (1) and unknown (3). 18 patients stopped because of adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs were recurrent infections (11), gastrointestinal side effects (9), lymphopenia (7), thromboembolic events (6) and herpes zoster (5). In total 6 (4.1%) patients had thromboembolic events which included pulmonary embolism (4) and deep vein thrombosis (1) and central retinal artery thrombosis (1). Conclusion JAK inhibitors in this real-world population of RA patients were effective in reducing disease activity and patients had high persistence rates. Recurrent infections, herpes zoster and thrombo-embolism remain adverse events of concern.

Analisis Del Impacto Del Covid-19 En Pacientes Con Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal Empleando Inteligencia Artificial (Savana Manager)

Introduccion: Estudiamos el impacto del COVID-19 en pacientes con Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal (EII) en Castilla-La Mancha. Metodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo utilizando inteligencia artificial con capacidad de procesamiento de lenguaje natural, SAVANA manager. Esta herramienta, a pesar de sus sesgos (ej: duplicacion de casos), permite analizar grandes poblaciones. Analizamos datos de 1.808.010 pacientes durante 2020. Resultados: Se identificaron 2.243 pacientes con EII y COVID-19, que en comparacion con los casos de COVID-19 sin EII hubo mas hipertension arterial, diabetes mellitus, dislipemia, obesidad o tabaquismo. A pesar de ello, no se apreciaron diferencias en hospitalizacion (0,8607, 0,7320-1,0121, p = 0,0696), ingreso en UCI (0,4113, 0,1025-1,6508, p = 0,2102) o mortalidad (0,9099, 0,6123-1,3521, p = 0,6402). COVID-19 fue mas frecuente en pacientes con EII (3,6413, 3,4616-3,8303, p < 0,0001). Comparando pacientes con EII y COVID-19 segun sus tratamientos, vedolizumab es el unico con mayor riesgo de COVID-19 (0,3091, 0,0967-0,9886, p = 0,0478), sin embargo, el riesgo de hospitalizacion para vedolizumab es menor (0,3091, 0,0967-0,9886, p = 0,0478). Los inmunomoduladores tambien tienen un menor riesgo de hospitalizacion tanto solos (0,6677, 0,4650-0,9588, p = 0,0287) como combinados con anti-TNF (0,5109, 0,2836-0,9205, p = 0,0254). No se encontraron diferencias para monoterapia anti-TNF, ustekinumab o tofacitinib. La tasa de UCI y la mortalidad no son diferentes entre los tratamientos, salvo para tofacitinib (tasa de UCI 0,00%, mortalidad 10,00%), sin embargo, el pequeno numero de pacientes podrian sesgar este resultado. [Table presented] Conclusiones: COVID-19 en pacientes con EII no es diferente en hospitalizacion, ingreso en UCI o mortalidad en comparacion con la poblacion sin Ell. Los pacientes con Ell expuestos a inmunomoduladores y vedolizumab tienen menor riesgo de hospitalizacion que los no expuestos, no se encontraron diferencias para anti-TNF monoterapia o ustekinumab.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. Todos los derechos reservados.

Two years of the COVID-19 pandemic in the population of Czech patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with biological therapy*experience of the tertiary IBD center.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be associated with a more severe course of infections and a different response to vaccination, especially in complicated IBD course and in association with immune-modifying IBD treatment. The aim of this study was to describe COVID-19 pandemic during years 2020 2022 in IBD patients with long-Term biological therapy. Method(s): A retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence in the population of 1,177 IBD (Crohn s disease or ulcerative colitis) patients with long-Term biological therapy (IBD cohort) was performed. The incidence rate, crude incidence rate and standardized incidence ratio of COVID-19 in the IBD cohort, the odds ratio of infection depending on the type of biologic therapy administered, the dynamics of COVID-19 incidence depending on the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in the population and the current vaccination coverage of the IBD cohort were calculated. Result(s): From January 2020 to April 2022, 548 confirmed cases of COVID-19 (46.6%) were reported in the IBD cohort, with 39% share of PCR positivity in vaccinated individuals and with 95% occurrence of infection in unvaccinated part of the IBD cohort. Standardized incidence rate ratio of COVID-19 was 27% higher in the IBD cohort compared to the general Czech population. The dynamics of the development of the number of positive cases of COVID-19 in the IBD cohort was identical to the situation in the entire country. A higher odds ratio of the chances of infection was demonstrated in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, but not in patients treated with anti-integrins or monoclonal antibodies against interleukins. In the IBD cohort, 85.2% of patients were properly vaccinated, which was significantly more than the vaccination rate of the entire Czech population. Discussion and conclusion: During the two pandemic years, the incidence of COVID-19 in patients with severe IBD and long-Term biological treatment was higher compared to the general Czech population, despite the favorable vaccination coverage of this high-risk patients group. A higher risk was associated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy.Copyright © 2023 Galen s.r.o.. All rights reserved.

2020 Advances in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Annual Meeting Abstracts

The proceedings contain 78 papers. The topics discussed include: work disability, indirect costs and risk factors in patients with Crohn's disease in a Rio De Janeiro tertiary care center;proton pump inhibitors are associated with less severe periodontal disease: considerations for IBD patients;impact of COVID-19 pandemic in treatment adherence in inflammatory bowel disease patients;impact of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with inflammatory intestinal disease;utilization of biologic therapy in patients with microscopic colitis not responding to standard therapy;restrictive eating symptoms may persist in children adolescents with treated IBD: case series;power calculations in randomized controlled trials of inflammatory bowel disease;measuring patient-reported outcomes in Crohn's disease patients during the outbreak of COVID-19;Tofacitinib and ileal pouch anal anastomosis. a single-center case series;corticosteroids, aminosalicylates and gastrointestinal symptoms are associated with the need of hospitalization in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases and COVID-19;and manometric study and the role of the perianal disease and the clinical activity in anorectal dysfunction in Crohn's disease.

Effectiveness and Safety of Tofacitinib in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis: A Brazilian Observational Multicentric Study.

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease which affects the colorectal mucosa with a relapsing-remitting pattern. The therapeutic options currently available for the medical management of UC include many options. Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, more selective for JAK1 and JAK3, which reduces the inflammatory process involved in the pathogenesis of UC. Methods: Retrospective observational multicentric study of patients with UC who used tofacitinib in any phase of their treatment. Clinical remission and response (according to Mayo score), mucosal healing, primary and secondary loss of response, discontinuation of the drug with possible causes, and the need for dose optimization or switching to biologicals, need for surgery and adverse events were evaluated. Results: From a total of 56 included patients, clinical remission was observed in 43.6% at week 12, 54.5% at week 26, 57.9% at week 52, and 40% at the last follow-up visit. Clinical response was observed in 71.4%, 81.8%, 89.5%, and 61.8% at the same time periods, respectively. Mucosal healing rates were 50% and 17.8% needed colectomy. Conclusions: Tofacitinib was effective in induction and maintenance of clinical response and remission rates, compatible to other international real-word studies and meta-analyses.

Use of Upadacitinib in 11 Tofacitinib-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients at a Single Tertiary Care Center

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. Upadacitinib is an oral, selective, small molecule Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor that was recently approved in the United States for moderate to severe UC. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib excluded patients with a previous exposure to tofacitinib, a nonselective JAK inhibitor;therefore, the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with previous exposure to tofacitinib remains largely unknown. METHOD(S): We present a small retrospective case series of all patients with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis seen at our institution between with a prior exposure to tofacitinib who were initiated on upadacitinib between May and August of 2022. Demographic data was collected as well as outcome data on clinical improvement, steroid-free remission, biochemical improvement, colectomy status, and adverse events. RESULT(S): Eleven tofacitinib-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis were initiated on upadacitinib. Mean age was 38.1 years, five (45.5%) patients were female, nine (81.8%) patients were white, seven (63.6%) patients had pancolitis, and mean duration of UC was 7.4 years (Table 1). In this group, there were high rates of prior targeted therapy failures. These patients were followed for a mean of 121 days. The clinical course of each patient is presented in Table 2. Of the 11 patients included in our study, nine (81.8%) patients reported symptomatic improvement, six (54.5%) patients were able to successfully taper corticosteroids, and two (18.2%) patients underwent colectomy, one of which was elective and planned prior to initiating upadacitinib. The mean fecal calprotectin improvement was 1430mg/kg of patients with both baseline and follow-up testing. Three (27.3%) patients experienced an adverse event;two (18.2%) patients with mild COVID-19 not requiring hospitalization and one (9.1%) patient with Enteropathogenic E. Coli. DISCUSSION: This real-world single-center case series of 11 patients, suggests that upadacitinib may be an effective option for patients with a previous tofacitinib exposure. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023

The impact of COVID-19 on patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A population-based study using artificial intelligence

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a pandemic that is still very prevalent. Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) represent a special population considering their already altered immune system and their exposure to several immunosuppressive therapies. We pretend to study the impact of COVID-19 on IBD patients in our community, Castilla-La Mancha (a region in central Spain). Method(s): Retrospective observational study using an artificial intelligence with natural language processing capability, the SAVANA manager, we analyzed data from 1 808 010 patients with Electronic Medical Records (EMR) within the public health system of Castilla-La Mancha from March 1st 2020 to January 1st 2021. Data on demographic characteristics, hospitalization, ICU admission and mortality were collected. We compared COVID outcomes between IBD and non-IBD patients. We compared COVID outcomes in IBD patients according to their treatment (comparing each treatment group to those IBD patients with no treatment);we considered: Immunomodulators (azathioprine, mercaptopurine, methotrexate), antiTNF alone or combined with immunomodulator, vedolizumab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib;mesalazine and corticosteroids were not analyzed. Result(s): 2 243 patients with IBD suffered COVID-19, compared to COVID-19 cases without IBD there were less females, they suffered more arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, or tabacco use (TABLE 1). And yet, despite these being proven risk factors for worse outcomes for COVID-19, no differences were appreciated in hospitalization rate, ICU admission, or mortality between those with or without IBD (TABLE 2). COVID-19 was more frequent in IBD patients (32.59 vs 13.28%). Comparing IBD patients with COVID-19 according to their treatments (TABLE 3), vedolizumab is the only treatment with a higher risk for COVID-19 infection, however the hospitalization risk for vedolizumab is lower than for those without it. Immunomodulators do also have a lower hospitalization risk both alone or in combination with antiTNF, no differences were found for antiTNF monotherapy, ustekinumab or tofacitinib. ICU rate and mortality are no different between treatments, except for tofacitinib (0.00% ICU rate, 10.00% mortality), however the small number of patients using this treatment may bias this result. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 in IBD patients is no different in hospitalization, ICU admission or mortality compared to non-IBD population. IBD patients exposed to immunomodulators and vedolizumab have less hospitalization risk than those not exposed, no differences were found for antiTNF alone or ustekinumab. The impact of tofacitinib in COVID outcomes requires further investigation.

COVID-19 vaccine-induced neutralising antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/5 are diminished in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on anti-TNF or JAK-inhibitor therapy

Background: Patients with Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving anti-TNF or JAK-inhibitor therapy have attenuated responses to COVID-19 vaccination. We aimed to determine how IBD treatments affect neutralising antibody responses against the currently dominant Omicron BA.4/5 variants. Method(s): We prospectively recruited 329 adults (68 healthy controls (HC) and 261 IBD) who had received three doses of COVID-19 vaccine at nine UK centres. The IBD population was established (>12 weeks therapy) on either thiopurine (n=60), infliximab (IFX) (n=43), thiopurine and IFX combination (n=46), ustekinumab (n=43), vedolizumab (n=46) or tofacitinib (n=23). Pseudoneutralisation assays were performed and the half maximal inhibitory concentration (NT50) of participant sera was calculated. The primary outcome was anti-SARSCoV-2 neutralising response against wild-type (WT) virus and the BA.4/5 variant after the second and third doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, stratified by immunosuppressive therapy, adjusting for prior infection, ethnicity, vaccine type and age. Result(s): Heterologous (two doses adenovirus vaccine, third dose mRNA vaccine) and homologous (three doses mRNA vaccine) vaccination strategies significantly increased neutralising titres against both WT SARS-CoV-2 virus and the BA.4/5 variants in HCs and IBD (fig 1). Antibody titres against BA.4/5 were significantly lower than antibodies against WT virus in both groups (Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) [95% CI], 0.11 [0.09, 0.15], P<0.0001 in healthy participants;GMR 0.07 [0.06, 0.08], P<0.0001 in IBD patients). Multivariable models showed that neutralising antibodies against BA.4/5 after three doses of vaccine were significantly lower in IBD patients on IFX (GMR 0.44 [0.20, 0.97], P=0.042), IFX and thiopurine combination (GMR 0.34 [0.15, 0.77], P=0.0098) or tofacitinib (GMR 0.37 [0.15, 0.92], P=0.032), but not in patients on thiopurine monotherapy, ustekinumab or vedolizumab. Breakthrough infection was associated with lower neutralising antibodies against WT and BA.4/5 (P<0.05). Conclusion(s): A third dose of COVID-19 vaccine based on the WT spike glycoprotein boosts neutralising antibody titres in patients with IBD. However, responses are lower against the currently dominant variant BA.4/5, particularly in patients taking anti-TNF or JAK-inhibitor therapy. Breakthrough infections are associated with lower neutralising antibodies and immunosuppressed IBD patients may receive additional benefit from bivalent vaccine boosters which target Omicron variants. .

Use of Upadacitinib in 11 Tofacitinib-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis Patients at a Single Tertiary Care Center

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. Upadacitinib is an oral, selective, small molecule Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor that was recently approved in the United States for moderate to severe UC. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib excluded patients with a previous exposure to tofacitinib, a nonselective JAK inhibitor;therefore, the efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with previous exposure to tofacitinib remains largely unknown. METHOD(S): We present a small retrospective case series of all patients with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis seen at our institution between with a prior exposure to tofacitinib who were initiated on upadacitinib between May and August of 2022. Demographic data was collected as well as outcome data on clinical improvement, steroid-free remission, biochemical improvement, colectomy status, and adverse events. RESULT(S): Eleven tofacitinib-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis were initiated on upadacitinib. Mean age was 38.1 years, five (45.5%) patients were female, nine (81.8%) patients were white, seven (63.6%) patients had pancolitis, and mean duration of UC was 7.4 years (Table 1). In this group, there were high rates of prior targeted therapy failures. These patients were followed for a mean of 121 days. The clinical course of each patient is presented in Table 2. Of the 11 patients included in our study, nine (81.8%) patients reported symptomatic improvement, six (54.5%) patients were able to successfully taper corticosteroids, and two (18.2%) patients underwent colectomy, one of which was elective and planned prior to initiating upadacitinib. The mean fecal calprotectin improvement was 1430mg/kg of patients with both baseline and follow-up testing. Three (27.3%) patients experienced an adverse event;two (18.2%) patients with mild COVID-19 not requiring hospitalization and one (9.1%) patient with Enteropathogenic E. Coli. DISCUSSION: This real-world single-center case series of 11 patients, suggests that upadacitinib may be an effective option for patients with a previous tofacitinib exposure. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. (Table Presented).

A Comprehensive Mini-review on COVID-19 Pathogenesis on Perspectives of Cytokine Storm and Recent Developments in Anti-Covid Nucleotide Analogues

The world has been rocked by the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which has significantly changed our way of life. Despite the unusual measures taken, COVID-19 still exists and affects people all over the world. A remarkable amount of study has been done to find ways to combat the infection's unsurpassed level. No ground-breaking antiviral agent has yet been introduced to remove COVID-19 and bring about a return to normalcy, even though numerous pharmaceuticals and therapeutic technologies have been reused and discovered. The cytokine storm phenomenon is of utmost importance since fatality is strongly connected with the severity of the disease. This severe inflammatory phenomenon marked by increased amounts of inflammatory mediators can be targeted for saving patients' life. Our analysis demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specifically generates a lot of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and results in lymphocyte exhaustion. Tocilizumab is an IL-6 inhibitor that is currently thought to be both generally safe and effective. Additionally, corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors could be effective and dependable methods to reduce cytokine-mediated storm in SARS-CoV-2 patients.Copyright © The Author(s) 2023.

One-Year Comparison of Clinical and Endoscopic Outcomes of Tofacitinib Versus Vedolizumab for Ulcerative Colitis After Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Failure: A Real-World Cohort Study in the United States

Background: Tofacitinib (tofa) is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared 52 week real-world outcomes of tofa vs vedolizumab (vedo) for UC after anti-TNF failure. Method(s): In this retrospective cohort study, adults initiated tofa or vedo after failure of >=1 anti-TNF between 5/1/18 and 4/1/21 at a large U.S. medical center. Vedo patients were frequency matched to tofa patients 2:1 by age and sex. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission at 12 and 52 (+/- 4) weeks (SFCR 12 and 52, simple clinical colitis activity index [SCCAI] <=2 or provider assessment and no use of oral/IV steroids for >=30 days). The secondary outcome was endoscopic response (ER) within 52 weeks (decrease in Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES] by >=1 point). Other outcomes within 52 weeks: Endoscopic remission (MES=0), biochemical response/remission (improvement by 25%/normalization of C-reactive protein), drug discontinuation for non-response (NR), improvement in arthralgia, UC hospitalization, and adverse events (AEs). Multivariable logistic regression was performed for primary/secondary outcomes adjusting for UC duration, number of prior anti-TNFs, steroid/immunomodulator use, albumin, Montreal disease extent >E1, MES = 3, and UC hospitalization within 12 months. Result(s): 136 vedo patients were matched to 68 tofa patients. Tofa patients had more anti-TNF exposures, higher CRP and SCCAI, and most had prior vedolizumab exposure (Table 1). 54% of tofa vs 46% of vedo patients achieved SFCR 12 and 59% vs 45% achieved SFCR 52. Within 52 weeks, 74% tofa vs 55% vedo had ER, 30% vs 27% had endoscopic remission, 55% vs 50% had improvement in arthralgia, 71% vs 59% had biochemical response, 46% vs 32% had biochemical remission, 5% vs 13% had UC hospitalization, 30% vs 29% discontinued treatment for NR, and 0% vs 2% discontinued treatment due to AEs (vedo group only: Perforated diverticulitis, nausea, and oral pain) (Figure 1). During available follow-up (not limited to 52 weeks), the most common AEs (reported among >1% of total cohort) included rash (0% tofa vs 4% vedo), C. difficileinfection (1% vs 2%), shingles (2% vs 1%), COVID-19 (1% vs 2%), other infection (2% vs 4%), and elevated liver enzymes (1% vs 2%) (Figure 2). After multivariable logistic regression, tofa was associated with a non-significantly higher odds of SFCR 12 (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.77-3.62) and significantly higher odds of SFCR 52 (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.01-4.61) and ER within 52 weeks (aOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.08- 10.80) vs vedo. Conclusion(s): Tofa was associated with higher odds of SFCR 52 and ER vs vedo for UC. AEs were consistent with known safety profiles. Due to limited sample sizes, larger cohort studies are needed.

Covid-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Case Series of 10 Cases from Dominican Republic

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused tremendous impact globally due to the significant morbidity and mortality caused by this virus. It is currently known that the probability of becoming seriously ill from this disease is higher in older adults, in people with pre-existing comorbidities, and those with a suppressed immune state. Therefore, transplant patients are not the exception. Considering the importance of this topic and the scarce information on the outcome of this type of patients, especially in Latin America, this series of cases is focused on our experience with 10 kidney transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Method(s): We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of kidney transplant patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) between April 2020 and May 2021. Result(s): The age range of the patients was 41 to 68 years, where 8 of these were men. The most common admission symptoms were fever (80%), dyspnea (70%), myalgia/arthralgia (50%), and headache (50%). The most prevalent laboratory findings were lymphocytopenia and increased inflammatory markers such as D-dimer, LDH, procalcitonin, erythrocyte sedimentation, and ferritin. General management included supportive treatment, statins, and antithrombotic therapy, while the specific treatment options were hydroxychloroquine, antivirals, corticosteroids, Intravenous Immunoglobulin, tofacitinib, and convalescent plasma. All the patients improved and were discharged. Two of them went to the ICU and only one required mechanical ventilation. The majority of the patients (70%) remained with their baseline immunosuppression without dose reduction or suspension. Conclusion(s): Kidney transplant recipients are more susceptible to infections, along with increased disease severity. At the same time their immunosuppressed state may reduce the inflammatory response following this type of infection. Decisions were based on stopping or attenuating the viral load and the systemic inflammation caused by this virus, but at the same time protecting against acute allograft rejection and the coinfection with other pathogens. Our findings suggest that the use of statins and antithrombotic prophylaxis in all hospitalized transplant patients may be beneficial to reduce the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection. Also, the maintenance of immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with worse outcomes. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023

Treatment outcome of tofacitinib dose reduction to 5 mg BID vs remaining on 10 mg BID in patients with Ulcerative Colitis who were in stable remission on 10 mg BID: Updated 30-month data from the double-blind, randomised RIVETING study

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. The long-term, Phase 3b/4 RIVETING study (NCT03281304) assessed the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib dose reduction from tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) maintenance therapy to 5 mg BID in patients (pts) in stable remission. 1 We present a final analysis of the RIVETING study after >=30 months of treatment. Method(s): RIVETING was a double-blind, randomised, parallelgroup study with a 42-month (M) duration. Eligible pts had received tofacitinib 10 mg BID for >=2 consecutive years in an open-label, long-term extension study (NCT01470612), had been in stable remission for >=6 months and corticosteroid-free for >=4 weeks prior to baseline. The primary efficacy endpoint was remission at M6 based on modified Mayo (mMayo) score (endoscopic and stool frequency subscores of <=1 and rectal bleeding subscore of 0).1 RIVETING was terminated (primary objective met) when all pts had passed M30 (or discontinued);some pts had already completed all visits up to M42. Here, we assess efficacy at M30 and safety throughout. Result(s): Overall, 140 pts were randomised (1:1) to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID;50.0% and 62.9% were in remission based on mMayo score at M30 in the 5 and 10 mg BID dose groups, respectively, with consistent findings observed for other secondary efficacy endpoints (Table 1). At M30, observed differences for mMayo remission between tofacitinib 10 and 5 mg BID were generally greater in the subgroup with a baseline endoscopic subscore of 1 vs 0 and in the subgroup with vs without prior tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) failure (Table 1). The percentage of pts who experienced loss of remission by M30, as estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves, was numerically higher in the 5 vs the 10 mg BID dose group (28.1%;95% confidence interval [CI], 17.68-39.49 vs 21.7%;95% CI, 12.21-32.95, respectively). Table 2 shows adverse events of special interest, by dose group. One death occurred due to fatal coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia (10 mg BID). Conclusion(s): These long-term data showed that most pts in stable remission on tofacitinib 10 mg BID maintenance therapy maintained mMayo score remission through M30 after dose reduction to 5 mg BID. Dose group difference in remission at M30 was consistent with that at M6.1 Differences in remission between the tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID groups were greater in subgroups with an endoscopic subscore of 1 vs 0 and in subgroups with vs without prior TNFi failure. Overall, safety findings were consistent with tofacitinib's known safety profile;incidence of serious infections and herpes zoster was numerically higher in the tofacitinib 10 vs 5 mg BID group. (Table Presented).

Superior Effectiveness of Tofacitinib Compared to Vedolizumab in Anti-TNF-experienced Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Nationwide Dutch Registry Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinicians face difficulty in when and in what order to position biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and tofacitinib in anti-TNF-exposed patients with UC in our prospective nationwide Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Registry. METHODS: Patients with UC who failed anti-TNF treatment and initiated vedolizumab or tofacitinib treatment were identified in the Initiative on Crohn and Colitis Registry in the Netherlands. We selected patients with both clinical as well as biochemical or endoscopic disease activity at initiation of therapy. Patients previously treated with vedolizumab or tofacitinib were excluded. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index ≤2), biochemical remission (C-reactive protein ≤5 mg/L or fecal calprotectin ≤250 µg/g), and safety outcomes were compared after 52 weeks of treatment. Inverse propensity score-weighted comparison was used to adjust for confounding and selection bias. RESULTS: Overall, 83 vedolizumab- and 65 tofacitinib-treated patients were included. Propensity score-weighted analysis showed that tofacitinib-treated patients were more likely to achieve corticosteroid-free clinical remission and biochemical remission at weeks 12, 24, and 52 compared with vedolizumab-treated patients (odds ratio [OR], 6.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.81-10.50; P < .01; OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.89-4.84; P < .01; and OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.15-2.99; P = .01; and OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.96-5.45; P < .01; OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.14-3.07; P = .01; and OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06-3.09; P = .03, respectively). There was no difference in infection rate or severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib was associated with superior effectiveness outcomes compared with vedolizumab in anti-TNF-experienced patients with UC along with comparable safety outcomes.